Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1363

reference
201-tree-1
name
1363
tree-preservation-order

undefined

201-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.026588 50.865060)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.026532 50.865054,-1.026534 50.865065,-1.026542 50.865075,-1.026554 50.865083,-1.026570 50.865088,-1.026588 50.865090,-1.026605 50.865088,-1.026621 50.865083,-1.026634 50.865076,-1.026642 50.865066,-1.026645 50.865054,-1.026643 50.865043,-1.026635 50.865033,-1.026622 50.865025,-1.026607 50.865020,-1.026589 50.865018,-1.026572 50.865020,-1.026556 50.865025,-1.026543 50.865033,-1.026535 50.865042,-1.026532 50.865054)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL